矛盾纠纷实质化解的司法理念与实践路径

The Judicial Philosophy and Practical Pathways for the Substantive Resolution of Conflicts and Disputes

摘要:

在新时代背景下,司法解纷的有限性、司法专业性、司法终局性被赋予新的时代内涵,有助于促进司法活动真正实现定分止争。纠纷实质化解需要从理念、治理主体、解纷模式、具体措施等多方面进行完善。树立以人民为中心的司法理念,通过司法全流程公开保障民主监督进而提高司法公信力,是实现社会矛盾纠纷实质化解的重要途径。在实践上要完善释法明理,加强类案同判,搭建司法专业性与民众朴素认知之间的"桥梁"。并且,对纠纷当事人辅之以心理疏导,缓和双方对立情绪,深挖矛盾起因,从根源上化解纠纷,达到定分止争、案结事了。同时,构建司法机关参与的基层社会治理体系,优先适用非诉讼解纷方式,以多元化纠纷化解格局促进纠纷的源头预防和实质化解。

Abstract:

In the context of the new era, the limitations of judicial dispute resolution, judicial professionalism, and judicial finality have been endowed with new contemporary connotations, which contribute to advancing judicial activities in achieving the fundamental goals of resolving disputes and quelling conflicts. The substantive resolution of disputes necessitates comprehensive improvements in judicial ideas, governance entities, dispute resolution models, and concrete measures. Establishing a centered judicial idea and ensuring democratic oversight through full transparency of judicial procedures to enhance judicial credibility serves as a critical pathway to realizing the substantive resolution of social conflicts. In practice, it is imperative to refine the interpretation of law and clarification of legal principles, strengthen the consistency of judgments in analogous cases, and construct a "bridge" between judicial expertise and people’s simple cognition. Additionally, providing psychological counseling to disputing parties to alleviate antagonism, delving into the root causes of conflicts, and addressing grievances at their source are essential to achieving lasting dispute resolution and case closure. Concurrently, building a grassroots social governance system with judicial organ participation, prioritizing non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms, and fostering a pluralistic dispute resolution framework will promote the proactive prevention and substantive resolution of conflicts.